Multi-camera portal
Fixed camera array capturing every container face under consistent geometry and lighting as it passes the gate.
From inspection image to defensible damage evidence.
An automated container and cargo inspection system that captures condition at entry and exit, classifies damage consistently, and produces an evidence package that stands up in a claim.
01 — The problem
Damage disputes were settled by argument. A container arrived damaged, the terminal said it arrived that way, the carrier said it did not, and the evidence was a handful of phone photographs taken from inconsistent angles by whoever was on the gate.
The inconsistency was the real cost. Two inspectors graded the same dent differently, so claims outcomes depended on who was working that shift rather than on the condition of the box.
02 — What we did
We standardised capture before touching classification. A fixed multi-camera portal photographs every face of every container under controlled geometry and lighting, so entry and exit images are directly comparable rather than approximately similar.
With comparable capture, difference becomes provable. The system aligns entry and exit imagery, isolates what changed during custody, and produces a package with both images, the delta, the classification and the full chain of custody attached.
You cannot prove a difference between two photographs taken from different angles.
Two of the screens that carry the most weight in daily use, rebuilt here from the production design system.
Difference becomes provableControlled capture geometry makes entry and exit images directly comparable, so what changed during custody is isolated rather than argued.
Patterns across the fleetConsistent grading made damage concentration by route and handler visible for the first time.
Grouped by the job each set of capabilities exists to do, rather than by which team built it.
Fixed camera array capturing every container face under consistent geometry and lighting as it passes the gate.
Container number and seal read automatically and reconciled against the booking.
Occlusion, motion blur and exposure problems detected at capture so the pass can be repeated immediately.
Inspectors add close-range detail shots that inherit the same metadata and chain of custody.
Dents, punctures, corrosion, door damage and structural deformation localised on the container surface model.
Graded against the industry damage taxonomy so results are consistent across shifts and terminals.
Entry and exit imagery aligned to isolate exactly what changed during custody.
Detected damage mapped onto standard repair codes and estimated cost.
Inspection reports produced automatically with annotated imagery and classification rationale.
A complete bundle: both captures, the delta, grading, timestamps and custody chain.
Side-by-side presentation designed for a claims adjuster rather than an engineer.
Damage patterns tracked by route, handler and equipment type.
Layer by layer, with the reason each one exists — because the reason is usually the interesting part.
Synchronised multi-camera rig with controlled lighting and trigger detection, producing a consistent capture set per pass.
OCR of container and seal numbers reconciled against terminal booking systems.
Segmentation and classification trained against the industry damage taxonomy with calibrated severity output.
Geometric alignment of entry and exit captures with change isolation on the container surface model.
Immutable storage of captures and findings with signed, exportable evidence bundles.
Technology
Measured against how the operation ran before, not against a benchmark chosen after the fact.
Grading stopped depending on the shift. The same damage receives the same severity regardless of who is on the gate.
Custody deltas are provable. Controlled capture geometry makes entry-to-exit comparison meaningful.
Claims packages are automatic. Evidence bundles are generated from the inspection record, not assembled after a dispute.
Patterns emerged across the fleet. Damage concentrated by route and handler became visible for the first time.
How it ran
Designed and validated the portal geometry, because comparability depends entirely on it.
Container and seal OCR with terminal system reconciliation.
Detection, taxonomy-aligned grading and entry-exit change isolation.
Report generation, signed evidence bundles and gate deployment.
From defect detection to defect causality.
A multimodal system that correlates line video, machine telemetry, batch records and operator actions to explain why a defect happened, not merely that it did..
Not alarm detection. Failure hypothesis reduction.
A correlation engine that turns an alarm storm into a short ranked list of probable root causes by reasoning over network topology and fault propagation rather than alarm counts..
From a single inspection to longitudinal asset integrity.
A vision system that detects and localises pipeline deterioration, then tracks each defect across inspection cycles so maintenance is prioritised by progression rather than by appearance..
Tell us what you run. We will reply within two business days with what we would build for your situation — and, just as usefully, what we would leave out.